Ukrainian Antarctic Journal

Vol 24 No 1(32) (2026): Ukrainian Antarctic Journal
Articles

Ionospheric response to the weak geomagnetic storm of 1–2 February 2025 in the Weddell Sea Anomaly region: observations from Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station

Maryna Reznychenko
Institute of Ionosphere, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine; Space Research Centre of Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 00-716, Poland
Oleksandr Bogomaz
Institute of Ionosphere, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine; Institute of Radio Astronomy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
Dmytro Kotov
Institute of Ionosphere, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
Taras Zhivolup
Institute of Ionosphere, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
Kateryna Martynova
Institute of Ionosphere, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
Viktor Burmaka
Institute of Ionosphere, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
Vyacheslav Kolodyazhnyi
Institute of Ionosphere, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
Published July 2, 2026
Keywords
  • electron density,
  • F2-layer,
  • ionosonde,
  • ionosphere,
  • ionospheric storm,
  • negative phase
  • ...More
    Less
How to Cite
Reznychenko, M., Bogomaz, O., Kotov, D., Zhivolup, T., Martynova, K., Burmaka, V., & Kolodyazhnyi, V. (2026). Ionospheric response to the weak geomagnetic storm of 1–2 February 2025 in the Weddell Sea Anomaly region: observations from Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 24(1(32), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.1.2026.757

Abstract

The ionospheric response to the weak geomagnetic storm of 1–2 February 2025 was studied within the Weddell Sea Anomaly region. The behavior of the key ionospheric parameters (NmF2 and hmF2) was analysed using ionosonde observations from the Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station and vertical total electron content derived from Global Navigation Satellite System measurements. A pronounced nighttime depletion was observed in both ionosonde F2-layer peak electron density (NmF2) and the total electron content values on 1 and 2 February 2025. This indicates the development of the negative phase of the ionospheric storm and a weakening of the Weddell Sea Anomaly under minor geomagnetic disturbances. NmF2 decreased by a factor of ~2 on 1 February and by a factor of ~5 on 2 February, while the total electron content was reduced by ~15–20 TECU and ~25 TECU, respectively. The negative phase penetrated farther toward the equator on 1 February, whereas on 2 February it remained restricted to high- and mid-latitude regions. Notably, such a strong depletion in NmF2 occurred despite a significant uplift of the F2-layer peak height (hmF2) by ~60–70 km. No clear signatures of vertical plasma transport driven by the penetration electric field of magnetospheric origin were found in the observed hmF2 variations. The likely reason for such a depletion in ionospheric plasma density is storm-time changes in neutral composition associated with upwelling, reduction in the O/N2 ratio, and transport of the composition disturbance zone by thermospheric winds from high to low latitudes. These results demonstrate that even minor geomagnetic storms can substantially modify the ionosphere–thermosphere system over Antarctica and significantly impact the Weddell Sea Anomaly.

References

  1. Akasofu, S.-I. (1981). Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere. Space Science Reviews, 28, 121–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00218810
  2. Bellchambers, W. H., & Piggott, W. R. (1958). Ionospheric measurements made at Halley Bay. Nature, 182, 1596–1597. https://doi.org/10.1038/1821596a0
  3. Borries, C., Berdermann, J., Jakowski, N., & Wilken, V. (2015). Ionospheric storms–A challenge for empirical forecast of the total electron content. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 120(4), 3175–3186. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA020988
  4. Buonsanto, M. J. (1999). Ionospheric storms – A review. Space Science Reviews, 88, 563–601. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005107532631
  5. Buonsanto, M. J., González, S. A., Lu, G., Reinisch, B. W., & Thayer, J. P. (1999). Coordinated incoherent scatter radar study of the January 1997 storm. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 104(A11),24625–24637. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900358
  6. Chakraborty, S., & Seemala, G. K. (2026). Ionospheric responses over the Antarctic region to intense space weather events: Plasma convection vs. auroral precipitation. Advances in Space Research, 77(2), 2602–2613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.10.107
  7. Chen, Y., Liu, L., Le, H., Zhang, H., & Zhang, R. (2022). Responding trends of ionospheric F2-layer to weaker geomagnetic activities. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2022005
  8. Correia, E., Spogli, L., Alfonsi, L., Cesaroni, C., Gulisano, A. M., Thomas, E. G., Ramirez, R. F. H., & Rodel, A. A. (2017). Ionospheric F-region response to the 26 September 2011 geomagnetic storm in the Antarctica American and Australian sectors. Annales Geophysicae, 35(5), 1113–1129. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1113-2017
  9. de Abreu, A. J., Correia, E., de Jesus, R., Venkatesh, K., Macho, E. P., Roberto, M., Fagundes, P. R., & Gende, M. (2023). Statistical analysis on the ionospheric response over South American mid- and near high-latitudes during 70 intense geomagnetic storms occurred in the period of two decades. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 245, 106060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2023.106060
  10. Dudeney, J. R., & Piggott, W. R. (1978). Antarctic ionospheric research. In L. J. Lanzerotti & C. G. Park (Eds.), Upper atmospheric research in Antarctica (Antarctic Research Series, Vol. 29, pp. 200–235). American Geophysical Union.
  11. Emmert, J. T. (2015). Thermospheric mass density: A review. Advances in Space Research, 56(5), 773–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.05.038
  12. Fuller-Rowell, T. J. (2011). Storm-time response of the thermosphere-ionosphere system. In M. A. Abdu & D. Pancheva (Eds.), Aeronomy of the Earth’s atmosphere and ionosphere (IAGA Special Sopron Book Series, Vol. 2, pp. 419–435). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0326-1_32
  13. Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Codrescu, M. V., Moffett, R. J., & Quegan, S. (1994). Response of the thermosphere and ionosphere to geomagnetic storms. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 99(A3), 3893–3914. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02015
  14. Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Codrescu, M. V., Rishbeth, H., Moffett, R. J., & Quegan, S. (1996). On the seasonal response of the thermosphere and ionosphere to geomagnetic storms. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 101(A2), 2343–2353. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA01614
  15. Gao, Q., Liu, L.-B., Zhao, B. Q., Wan, W.-X., Zhang, M.-L., & Ning, B.-Q. (2008). Statistical study of the storm effects in middle and low latitude ionosphere in the East-Asian sector. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 51(3), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.1234
  16. Goncharenko, L. P., Salah, J. E., van Eyken, A., Ho-wells, V., Thayer, J. P., Taran, V. I., Shpynev, B., Zhou, Q.,& Chau, J. (2005). Observations of the April 2002 geomagnetic storm by the global network of incoherent scatter radars. Annales Geophysicae, 23(1), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-163-2005
  17. Gonzalez, W. D., Joselyn, J. A., Kamide, Y.,Kroehl, H. W., Rostoker, G., Tsurutani, B. T., & Vasyliunas, V. M. (1994). What is a geomagnetic storm? Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 99(A4), 5771–5792. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02867
  18. Hernández-Pajares, M., Juan, J. M., Sanz, J., Orus, R., García-Rigo, A., Feltens, J., Komjathy, A., Schaer, S. C., & Krankowski, A. (2009). The IGS VTEC maps: A reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. Journal of Geodesy, 83(3–4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1
  19. Hernández-Pajares, M., Juan, J. M., Sanz, J., Aragón-Àngel, À., García-Rigo, A., Salazar, D., & Escudero, M. (2011). The ionosphere: Effects, GPS modeling and the benefits for space geodetic techniques. Journal of Geodesy, 85(12), 887–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0508-5
  20. Hernández-Pajares, M., Roma-Dollase, D., Krankow-ski, A., García-Rigo, A., & Orús-Pérez, R. (2017). Methodology and consistency of slant and vertical assessments for ionospheric electron content models. Journal of Geodesy, 91, 1405–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1032-z
  21. Horvath, I., & Essex, E. A. (2003). The Weddell Sea anomaly observed with the TOPEX satellite data. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 65(6), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(03)00083-X
  22. Huang, X., & Reinisch, B. W. (1996). Vertical electron density profiles from the Digisonde network. Advances in Space Research, 18(6), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(95)00912-4
  23. Koloskov, O., Kashcheyev, A., Bogomaz, O., Sopin, A., Gavrylyuk, B., & Zalizovski, A. (2023). Performance analysis of a portable low-cost SDR-based ionosonde. Atmosphere, 14(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010159
  24. Liu, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2011). Weakening of the mid-latitude summer nighttime anomaly during geomagnetic storms. Earth, Planets and Space, 63, 371–375. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2010.11.012
  25. Mansilla, G. A. (2017). Response of the Antarctic ionosphere to some intense geomagnetic storms. The Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 11, 16–28, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874282301711010016. https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOASCJ/TOASCJ-11-16.pdf
  26. Melendi, Y. D., Bravo, M., Molina, M. G., Paz, M., Urra, B., De Pasquale, L., Scipión, D. E., Namour, J., Duran, T., & Zalizovski, A. (2025). Global and regional ionospheric response to a moderate storm in South America and Antarctica using a multi-instrumental approach. Earth and Space Science, 12(8), e2025EA004281. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EA004281
  27. Mendillo, M. (2006). Storms in the ionosphere: Patterns and processes for total electron content. Reviews of Geophysics, 44(4), RG4001. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000193
  28. Perreault, P., & Akasofu, S. I. (1978). A study of geomagnetic storms. Geophysical Journal International, 54(3), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1978.tb05494.x
  29. Piggott, W. R., & Rawer, K. (1972). URSI handbook of ionogram interpretation and reduction. World Data Center A for Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Report UAG-23A.
  30. Prölss, G. W. (1997). Magnetic Storm Associated Perturbations of the Upper Atmosphere. In B. T. Tsurutani, W. D. Gonzalez, Y. Kamide & J. K. Arballo (Eds.), Magnetic Storms (pp. 227–241). https://doi.org/10.1029/GM098p0227
  31. Prölss, G. W. (2004). Physics of the Earth’s space environment: An introduction. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97123-5
  32. Qian, L., Solomon, S. C., & Kane, T. J. (2009). Seasonal variation of thermospheric density and composition. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 114(A1), A01312. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013643
  33. Reznychenko, M., Bogomaz, O., Kotov, D., Zhivolup, T., Burmaka, V., & Kolodyazhnyi, V. (2026). Raw ionogram data from Akademik Vernadsky station (Jan 30 – Feb 5, 2025) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19480381
  34. Richmond, A. D., & Lu, G. (2000). Upper-atmospheric effects of magnetic storms: A brief tutorial. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 62(12), 1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(00)00094-8
  35. Sojka, J. J., David, M., & Schunk, R. W. (2002). A mid-latitude space weather hazard driven directly by the magnetosphere. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 64(5–6), 687–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00030-5
  36. Wei, Y., Zhao, B., Guozhu, L., & Wan, W. (2015). Electric field penetration into Earth’s ionosphere: A brief review for 2000–2013. Scientific Bulletin, 60(8), 748–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0749-4