An artificial neural network for analysis of ionograms obtained by ionosonde at the Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station
- critical frequency,
- deep learning,
- electron density,
- ionosphere,
- pattern recognition
Copyright (c) 2020 Ukrainian Antarctic Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The article presents the developed artificial neural network for F2 ionosphere layer traces scaling on ionograms obtained using the IPS-42 ionosonde installed at the Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station. The parameters of the IPS-42 ionosonde and the features of the data obtained with it, in particular the format of the output files, are presented. The advantages of using an artificial neural network for identification of traces on ionograms are demonstrated. Usually, an automatic scaling of the ionograms requires a lot of machine time however implementation of an artificial neural network speeds up computations significantly allowing to process incoming ionograms even in the real time mode. The choice of architecture of an artificial neural network is substantiated. The U-Net architecture was chosen. The method of creating and training the neural network is described. The artificial neural network development process included choosing the number of layers, types of activation functions, optimization method and input layer size. Software developed was written in Python programming language with use of the Keras library. Examples of data used for training of the artificial neural network are shown. The results of testing an artificial neural network are presented. The data obtained with the artificial neural network are compared with the results of manual processing of ionograms. Data for training the artificial neural network were obtained in March, 2017 using the IPS-42 ionosonde installed at the Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station; data for testing were obtained in 2017 and 2020. The developed artificial neural network has minor flaws but they are easily eliminated by retraining the network on a more representative dataset (obtained in various years and seasons). The general results of testing indicate good prospects in further developing this artificial neural network and software for working with it.
References
- Bogomaz, O. V., Kotov, D. V., Shulha, M. O., & Gorobets, M. V. (2019b). Comparison of the F2 layer peak height variations obtained by ionosonde and incoherent scatter radar. Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI", 25(1350), 58–61. Retrieved November 3, 2020, from http://iion.org.ua/article/bulletin-25/
- Bogomaz, O. V., Shulha, M. O., Kotov, D. V., Zhivolup, T. G., Koloskov, A. V., Zalizovski, A. V., Kashcheyev, S. B., Reznychenko, A. I., Hairston, M. R., & Truhlik, V. (2019a). Ionosphere over Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station under minima of solar and magnetic activities, and daily insolation: case study for June 2019. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 2(19), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.2(19).2019.154
- Broom, S. M. (1984). A new ionosonde for Argentine Islands ionospheric observatory, Faraday Station. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, 62, 1–6. Retrieved November 3, 2020, from http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/523821/
- Bullett, T., Malagnini, A., Pezzopane, M., & Scotto, C. (2010). Application of Autoscala to ionograms recorded by the VIPIR ionosonde. Advances in Space Research, 45(9), 1156–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.01.024
- Bushaev, V. (2018). Adam — latest trends in deep learning optimization. Towards Data Science. https://towardsdatascience.com/adam-latest-trends-in-deep-learning-optimization-6-be9a291375c
- Galkin, I. A., & Reinisch, B. W. (2008). The new ARTIST 5 for all digisondes. Ionosonde Network Advisory Group Bulletin, 69(8), 1–8. http://www.sws.bom.gov.au/IPSHosted/INAG/web-69/2008/artist5-inag.pdf
- Huang, X., & Reinisch, B. W. (1996). Vertical electron density profiles from the Digisonde network. Advances in Space Research, 18(6), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(95)00912-4
- Jeong, S. H., Kim, Y. H., Kim, K. N. (2018). Manual scaling of ionograms measured at Jeju (33.4° N, 126.3° E) throughout 2012. Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences, 35(3), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2018.35.3.143
- Koloskov, O. V., Kashcheyev, A. S., Zalizovski, A. V., Kashcheyev, S. B., Budanov, O. V., Charkina, O. V., Pikulik, I. I., Lysachenko, V. M., Sopin, A. O., Reznychenko, A. I. (2019). New digital ionosonde developed for Akademik Vernadsky station. In IX International Antarctic Conference dedicated to the 60th anniversary of the signing of the Antarctic Treaty in the name of peace and development of international cooperation, 14—16 May 2019, Kyiv, Ukraine (pp. 170–171). Retrieved November 3, 2020, from http://uac.gov.ua/internationalcooperation/mak/mak-2019/
- Mochalov, V., & Mochalova, A. (2019). Application of Deep Learning to Recognize Ionograms. In 2019 Russian Open Conference on Radio Wave Propagation (RWP), 1–6 July 2019, Kazan, Russia (pp. 477–479). https://doi.org/10.1109/RWP.2019.8810326
- Pezzopane, M., & Scotto, C. (2007). Automatic scaling of critical frequency foF2 and MUF(3000)F2: A comparison between Autoscala and ARTIST 4.5 on Rome data. Radio Science, 42(4), Article RS4003.
- Pezzopane, M., Scotto, C., Tomasik, Ł., & Krasheninnikov, I. (2010). Autoscala: an aid for different ionosondes. Acta Geophysica, 58, 513–526. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-009-0038-1
- Piggott, W. R., & Rawer, K. (Eds.). (1972). URSI handbook of ionogram interpretation and reduction (2nd ed.). (Report UAG23, WDC-A for STP, NOAA). http://www.sws.bom.gov.au/IPSHosted/INAG/uag_23a/UAG_23A_indexed.pdf
- Reinisch, B. W., & Galkin, I. A. (2011). Global ionospheric radio observatory (GIRO). Earth, Planets and Space, 63, 377–381. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.03.001
- Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In N. Navab, J. Hornegger, W. Wells, & A. Frangi (Eds), Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2015. MICCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol 9351 (pp. 234–241). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
- Wagner, F. H., Sanchez, A., Tarabalka, Y., Lotte, R. G., Ferreira, M. P., Aidar, M. P. M., Gloor, E., Phillips, O. L., & Aragão, L. E. O. C. (2019). Using the U-net convolutional network to map forest types and disturbance in the Atlantic rainforest with very high resolution images. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 5(4), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.111
- Wakai, N., Ohyama, H., & Koizumi, T. (1987). Manual of ionogram scaling. Radio Research Laboratory, Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications. http://www.ursi.org/files/CommissionWebsites/INAG/scaling/japanese_manual_v3.pdf
- Xiao, Z., Wang, J., Li, J., Zhao, B., Hu, L., & Liu, L. (2020). Deep-learning for ionogram automatic scaling. Advances in Space Research, 66(4), 942–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.05.009
- Yang, X., Li, X., Ye, Y., Lau, R. Y. K., Zhang, X., & Huang, X. (2019). Road detection and centerline extraction via deep recurrent convolutional neural network u-net. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(9), 7209–7220. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2912301
- Zalizovski A., Koloskov O., Kashcheyev A., Kashcheyev S., Yampolski Y., & Charkina O. (2020). Doppler vertical sounding of the ionosphere at the Akademik Vernadsky station. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 1, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.1.2020.379
- Zhang, Z., Liu, Q., & Wang, Y. (2018). Road extraction by deep residual u-net. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 15(5), 749–753. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2018.2802944