Ukrainian Antarctic Journal

No 6-7 (2008): Ukrainian Antarctic Journal
Articles

Physical modeling of geoelectromagnetic variations of Antarctic peninsula region

PDF (Українська)
  • V. Yu. Maksymchuk,
  • V. M. Kobzova,
  • B. T. Ladanivskyy,
  • P. K. Martyuk,
  • L. T. Goncharuk
V. Yu. Maksymchuk
Carpathian Branch of Institute of Geophysics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv
V. M. Kobzova
Carpathian Branch of Institute of Geophysics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv
B. T. Ladanivskyy
Carpathian Branch of Institute of Geophysics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv
P. K. Martyuk
Carpathian Branch of Institute of Geophysics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv
L. T. Goncharuk
Carpathian Branch of Institute of Geophysics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.6-7.2008.487
Published December 15, 2008
Keywords
  • physical modeling,
  • magnetotelluric field,
  • Antarctic Peninsula
How to Cite
Maksymchuk, V. Y., Kobzova, V. M., Ladanivskyy, B. T., Martyuk, P. K., & Goncharuk, L. T. (2008). Physical modeling of geoelectromagnetic variations of Antarctic peninsula region. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, (6-7), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.6-7.2008.487

Abstract

The method of analog physical modeling was applied to study conductivity structure of Antarctic Peninsula and adjusting regions. The 3D scale conductivity model of region from 51.4° W to 68.6° W and from 60°S to 67.2°S with factor 1:200000 was created in the electrolytic tank with dimension 5x5x0.7 m according to a bathymetry map. The model was excited by the varying homogeneous magnetic field in the frequency band 6.0 – 0.1 MHz that corresponds to 2200 – 130000 s band in natural conditions. The magnetotelluric and geomagnetic response functions was obtained at 12 points along profile across model of Antarctic Peninsula. 2D inversion of obtained response functions was compared with real geoelectric cross section which are reliable known for scale model. This comparison has allowed to estimate the influence of real 3D effects on geoelectric investigation in the region under study.

PDF (Українська)

References

  1. Berdichevskij, M. N., Moroz, I. P., Kobzova, I. M. et al. (1987). Fizicheskoe modelirovanie v geoe`lektrike. [Physical modeling in geoelectrics]. Kyiv, Naukova dumka.
  2. Korepanov, V., Milinevskyi, H., Maksymchuk, V. et al. (2004). Stan ta perspektyvy doslidzhennia hlybynnoi budovy ta dynamiky zemnoi kory v raioni stantsii Akademik Vernadskyi heoelektromahnitnymy metodamy. [State and prospects of research of deep structure and dynamics of the earth's crust in the area of Akademik Vernadsky station by geoelectromagnetic methods]. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 2, 25–37.
  3. Logvinov, I. M., Tarasov, V. N., & Ladanivskij, B. T. (2006). E`lektromagnitny`e issledovaniya v rajone observatorii Akad. Vernadskij (Antarktida). [Electromagnetic research near the observatory of the Akademik Vernadsky (Antarctica)]. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 4-5, 21–29.
  4. Moroz, I. P., Kobzova, V. M., Ladanivskyi, B. T., Honcharuk, L. T. (1999). Ustanovka dlia modeliuvannia elektromahnitnoi induktsii v Zemli. [Equipment for modeling electromagnetic induction in the Earth]. Patent na vynakhid 94096874, G06 G7/48.
  5. Eggers, D. E. (1982). An eigenstate formulation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor. Geophysics, 47, 1204-1214.
  6. Kobzova, V.M., Ladanivskyy, B.T., & Korepanov, V. E. (2003). Physical modeling of the electromagnetic field of auroral electrojet. Acta Geophysica Polonica, 51(3), 337-345.
  7. Vanyan, L.L., Kuznetsov, V. A., Lyubetskaya, T.V. and the BEAR Working Group. (2002). Electrical Conductivity of the Crust beneath Central Lapland. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 38(10), 798-815. Translated from Fizika Zemli, 10, 4-22 (2002).