Ukrainian Antarctic Journal

No 1 (2021): Ukrainian Antarctic Journal
Articles

Variability of Weddell Sea ionospheric anomaly as deduced from observations at the Akademik Vernadsky station

PDF
  • A. Zalizovski,
  • I. Stanislawska,
  • V. Lisachenko,
  • O. Charkina
A. Zalizovski
Institute of Radio Astronomy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine; Space Research Centre of Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 00-716, Poland; State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine
I. Stanislawska
Space Research Centre of Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 00-716, Poland
V. Lisachenko
Institute of Radio Astronomy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
O. Charkina
Institute of Radio Astronomy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.1.2021.666
Published July 28, 2021
Keywords
  • ionosphere,
  • ionogram,
  • Weddell Sea anomaly,
  • median height-time diagram
How to Cite
Zalizovski, A., Stanislawska, I., Lisachenko, V., & Charkina, O. (2021). Variability of Weddell Sea ionospheric anomaly as deduced from observations at the Akademik Vernadsky station. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, (1), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.1.2021.666

Copyright (c) 2021 Ukrainian Antarctic journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Ionospheric Weddell Sea anomaly is an inversion of diurnal variation of the electron density in the ionosphere over Antarctic Peninsula, Weddell Sea, and neighbor territories observed during Antarctic summer. This paper aims at analyzing the reaction of the ionosphere during the Weddell Sea anomaly to changes in solar and geomagnetic activity as deduced from the data of vertical sounding of the ionosphere conducted at the Akademik Vernadsky station. The aim is achieved by comparing the monthly median values of the critical frequencies of the ionosphere (foF2) during Weddell Sea anomaly for the years of high and low solar activity; as well as by comparison of median December height-time diagrams (HT-diagrams) of foF2 calculated separately for the time intervals characterized by low or high levels of F10.7 and K indices for the period from 2007 till 2016. It was experimentally demonstrated that the Weddell Sea anomaly depends on the levels of solar ultraviolet flux and local K indices. The biggest nighttime maximum of ionization corresponds to low K indices and high values of F10.7. The most accurate inversion of diurnal variation of electron density in the F region is observed under the low values of K index and low F10.7 flux. The growth of geomagnetic activity decreases the nighttime ionization under both low and high levels of F10.7 fluxes and leads to a blur of the night maximum. Visible virtual heights of maximums increase together with F10.7 independently of the K index level. Blurring of the night maximum can be explained by destruction of the field of thermospheric winds supporting the nighttime anomaly, and/or by increasing role of plasma drifts in comparison with wind impact. The growth of visible virtual height of the nighttime maximum with increasing solar F10.7 flux could be explained by the gain of equatorward thermospheric wind with increasing solar ultraviolet flux that leads to growth of plasma upwelling effect. The Doppler frequency shift of the signals reflected from the ionosphere during nighttime in presence of the Weddell Sea anomaly is close to zero which could be explained by a stable F2 layer formed as a result of dynamic equilibrium between photochemical processes and upward plasma transport.

PDF

References

  1. Bellchambers, W. H., & Piggott, W. R. (1958). Ionospheric measurements made at Halley Bay. Nature, 182, 1596–1597. https://doi.org/10.1038/1821596a0
  2. Chang, L. C., Liu, H., Miyoshi, Y., Chen, C.-H., Chang, F.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Liu, J.-Y., & Sun, Y.-Y. (2015). Structure and origins of the Weddell Sea Anomaly from tidal and planetary wave signatures in FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC observations and GAIA GCM simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research:Space Physics, 120(2), 1325–1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020752
  3. Chen, C. H., Huba, J. D., Saito, A., Lin, C. H., & Liu, J. Y. (2011). Theoretical study of the ionospheric Weddell Sea Anomaly using SAMI2. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 116(A4), A04305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015573
  4. Chen, Y., Liu, L., Le, H., Wan, W., & Zhang, H. (2016). The global distribution of the dusk-to-nighttime enhancement of summer NmF2 at solar minimum. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 121(8), 7914–7922. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022670
  5. Dudeney, J. R. & Piggott, W. R. (1978). Antarctic ionospheric research. Antarctic Research Series, 29, 200–235.
  6. https://doi.org/10.1029/AR029p0200
  7. He, M., Liu, L., Wan, W., Ning, B., Zhao, B., Wen, J., Yue, X., & Le, H. (2009). A study of the Weddell Sea Anomaly observed by FORMOSAT_3/COSMIC. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 114(A12), A12309. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014175
  8. Horvath, I. (2006). A total electron content space weather study of the nighttime Weddell Sea Anomaly of 1996/1997 southern summer with TOPEX/Poseidon radar altimetry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 111(A12), A12317. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011679
  9. Horvath, I. & Essex, E. A. (2003). The Weddell sea anomaly observed with the TOPEX satellite data. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 65(6), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(03)00083-X
  10. Jakowski, N., Hoque, M. M., Kriegel, M. & Patidar, V. (2015). The persistence of the NWA effect during the low solar activity period 2007–2009. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 120(10), 9148–9160. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021600
  11. Jee, G., Burns, A. G., Kim, Y.-H., & Wang, W. (2009). Seasonal and solar activity variations of the Weddell Sea Anomaly observed in the TOPEX total electron content measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 114(A4), A04307. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013801
  12. Knyazeva, M. A., Zubova, Yu. V., & Namgaladze, A. A. (2010). Numerical modeling of the Weddell Sea Anomaly in behavior of the ionospheric F2-region. Vestnik of MSTU, 13(4/2), 1068–1077. http://vestnik.mstu.edu.ru/show-eng.shtml?art=1058 (in Russian)
  13. Kohl, H. & King, J. W. (1967). Atmospheric winds between 100 and 700 km and their effects on the ionosphere. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 29(9), 1045–1062. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(67)90139-0
  14. Lin, C. H., Liu, J. Y., Cheng, C. Z., Chen, C. H., Liu, C. H., Wang, W., Burns, A. G., & Lei, J. (2009). Three-dimensional ionospheric electron density structure of the Weddell Sea Anomaly. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 114(A2), A02312. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013455
  15. Lin, C. H., Liu, C. H., Liu, J. Y., Chen, C. H., Burns, A. G., & Wang, W. (2010). Midlatitude summer nighttime anomaly of the ionospheric electron density observed by FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 115(A3), A03308. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014084
  16. Liu, H. & Yamamoto, M. (2011). Weakening of the mid-latitude summer nighttime anomaly during geomagnetic storms. Earth, Planets and Space, 63, 371–375. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2010.11.012
  17. Nava, B., Coïsson, P., & Radicella, S. M. (2008). A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 70(15), 1856–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.01.015
  18. Picone, J. M., Hedin, A. E., Drob, D. P., & Aikin, A. C. (2002). NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 107(A12), 1468. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009430
  19. Ren, Z., Wan, W., Liu, L., Le, H., & He, M. (2012). Simulated midlatitude summer nighttime anomaly in realistic geomagnetic fields. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 117(A3), A03323. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017010
  20. Richards, P. G., Meier, R. R., Chen, S.-P., Drob, D. P., & Dandenault, P. (2017). Investigation of the causes of the longitudinal variation of the electron density in the Weddell Sea Anomaly. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 122(6), 6562–6583. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023565
  21. Zakharenkova, I., Cherniak, I., & Shagimuratov, I. (2017). Observations of the Weddell Sea Anomaly in the ground-based and space-borne TEC measurements. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 161, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.06.014
  22. Zalizovski, A. V., Kashcheyev, A. S., Kashcheyev, S. B., Koloskov, A. V., Lisachenko, V. N., Paznukhov, V. V., Pikulik, I. I., Sopin, A. A., & Yampolski, Yu. M. (2018). A prototype of a portable coherent ionosonde model. (2018). Space science and technology, 26(3), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2018.03.010 (in Russian)
  23. Zalizovski, A., Koloskov, O., Kashcheyev, A., Kashcheyev, S., Yampolski, Y., & Charkina, O. (2020). Doppler vertical sounding of the ionosphere at the Akademik Vernadsky station. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 1, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.1.2020.379