Ukrainian Antarctic Journal

Vol 20 No 2(25) (2022): Ukrainian Antarctic Journal
Articles

Increasing the accuracy of absolute measurements at the Argentine Islands geomagnetic observatory of the Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station

Yu. Sumaruk
S.I. Subbotin Institute of Geophysics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine; State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine; Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, 79000, Ukraine
A. Marusenkov
Lviv Centre of Institute for Space Research, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and State Space Agency of Ukraine, Lviv, 79060, Ukraine
A. Neska
Institute of Geophysics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 01-452, Poland
V. Korepanov
Lviv Centre of Institute for Space Research, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and State Space Agency of Ukraine, Lviv, 79060, Ukraine
M. Leonov
State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine
Published December 30, 2022
Keywords
  • absolute observations,
  • declination,
  • geomagnetic observatory,
  • inclination
How to Cite
Sumaruk, Y., Marusenkov, A., Neska, A., Korepanov, V., & Leonov, M. (2022). Increasing the accuracy of absolute measurements at the Argentine Islands geomagnetic observatory of the Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 20(2(25), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.2.2022.697

Abstract

In recent years, the INTERMAGNET geomagnetic observatory Argentine Islands of Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station, located at Galindez Island, has been modernized. New devices were installed at the observatory: reference three-component fluxgate magnetometer LEMI-025, one-component Mag-01H Fluxgate Declinometer/Inclinometer with non-magnetic Wild T1 Theodolite (DI-magnetometer), and scalar Overhauser magnetometers GSM-19 and GSM-90. These devices have a high resolution and can carry out measurements with greater accuracy. Also, new methods of absolute observations and variation processing were introduced. In 2022, a new DI-magnetometer was installed; it practically did not change the baseline values of the variometer LEMI-025 compared to previous years, which indicates the reliability of the results, but made observations much more convenient. We present the results of processing absolute observations, carried out by different methods. Different techniques of calculating these observations are described, and certain shortcomings or inaccuracies in their application are noted. Recommendations to eliminate the identified shortcomings are proposed. The results of processing of absolute observations by different techniques are compared and the reason for the inconsistency of certain values is found. A new method of calculation of absolute observations is proposed, which was used at the observatory, which showed quite good results. In the new methodology, the calculation of errors of the DI-magnetometer, namely: the zero offset of the magnetic sensor, the azimuth collimation error δ and the elevation collimation error ε of its sensitivity axis relative to the axes of theodolite, is initiated. Analysis of these errors allows identifying and sometimes correcting the errors in absolute measurements. The installation of new devices and the application of new calculation methods made it possible to ensure better data quality and convenience of measurements at the station, to automate the data processing, preparation, and minimizing the influence of the human factor.

References

  1. Cotton, P. D., & Simmons, D. A. (1986). The geomagnetic observatory at Faraday, Argentine Islands. Polar Record, 23(143), 192–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400028394
  2. Jankowski, J., & Sucksdorff, C. (1996). IAGA Guide for Magnetic Measurements and Observatory Practice. International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy.
  3. Leonov, M., & Otruba, Yu. (2021). Measurement of the difference in the geomagnetic induction between the magnetometer pillars of the geomagnetic observatory of the Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 1, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.1.2021.662
  4. Marusenkov, A., Leonov, M., Korepanov, V., Leonov, S., Koloskov, A., Nakalov, Ye., & Otruba, Yu. (2019). Upgrade of the Argentine Islands INTERMAGNET observatory at Akademik Vernadsky station, Antarctica. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 1(18), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.1(18).2019.135
  5. Melnyk, G. V., & Bakhmutov, V. G. (2007/2008). The «Academic Vernadskiy» station in the network of the Ukrainian magnetic observatories of INTERMAGNET. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 6–7, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.6-7.2008.494
  6. Rasson, J. L. (2005). About absolute geomagnetic measurements in the observatory and in the field. Institut royal météorologique de Belgique.
  7. St-Louis, B. (Ed.). (2020). INTERMAGNET Technical Reference Manual, Version 5.0.0. INTERMAGNET Operations Committee and Executive Council. https://intermagnet.github.io/docs/Technical-Manual/technical_manual.pdf
  8. Sumaruk, Yu., Starostenko, V. I., & Legostaeva, O. V. (2011). Geomagnetic observatories of Ukraine in the Global Network INTERMAGNET. Russian Journal of Earth Sciences, 12, ES2002.
  9. Sumaruk, Y. P., & Sumaruk, T. P. (2016). Secular variations of geomagnetic field in Antarctica. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 38(2), 120–138. http://www.igph.kiev.ua/FullVersion/2016/gj2/art2916.pdf
  10. Worthington, E. W., & Matzka, J. (2017). U.S. Geological Survey experience with the residual absolutes method. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 6(2), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-419-2017