No 1 (2020): Ukrainian Antarctic Journal
Articles

The harmonization of small-scale marine spatial protection in the Argentine Islands area (Antarctic Peninsula) under the Antarctic Treaty System

A. Fedchuk
State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine
O. Sinna
V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
G. Milinevsky
State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine; College of Physics, International Center of Future Science, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, China
A. Utevsky
State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine; V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
Published July 7, 2020
Keywords
  • Argentine Islands,
  • Antarctic Peninsula,
  • marine environment,
  • protected areas,
  • Antarctic Treaty System

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to summarize the results of field studies carried out in the framework of the State Antarctic Research Program for 2011–2020 and undertaken to identify areas of special interest for small-scale marine spatial protection in the Argentine Islands water area. The scientific results reported in the publications and relevant meetings’ documents officially presented by the Ukrainian delegation in 2012–2019 were summarized and interpreted in view of the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) provisions on marine spatial protection. GIS analysis was applied to field data. It is shown that the development of protection regime for small-scale underwater landscape is based on systematic biogeographical data collected during seasonal and year-round Ukrainian Antarctic expeditions in 2011–2019. In order to harmonize the application of all available tools of spatial ecosystem-based protection across the ATS, it is proposed to designate the long-term environmental monitoring sites around Ukrainian Antarctic Akademik Vernadsky station as a new Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) consisting of terrestrial and marine components. It is shown that the marine component of the proposed ASPA could serve as one of the scientific reference areas of the broad-scale Marine Protected Area in Domain 1 within the Antarctic Peninsula region for assessing the impact of climate change on benthic communities, as well as breeding success and distribution of penguin colonies.

References

  1. Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM): Marine spatial protection and management under the Antarctic Treaty System: new opportunities for implementation and coordination, Information Paper IP-056 submitted by the IUCN (Buenos Aires, Argentina, June 20-July 1, 2011), 9 pp., 2011.
  2. ATCM: The role of the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting in protecting the marine environment through marine spatial protection, Information Paper IP-049 submitted by The Netherlands (Brasilia, June 20-July 1, 2014), 29 pp., 2014.
  3. Brooks, C.: Competing values on the Antarctic high seas: CCAMLR and the challenge of marine-protected areas, The Polar Journal, 3 (2), 277-300, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2013.854597
  4. Brooks, C.M.: Geopolitical complexity at the bottom of the world: CCAMLR's ongoing challenge of adopting marine protected areas, in: Governing Marine Living Resources in the Polar Regions, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977432.00012
  5. Brooks, C.M., Crowder, L.B., Curran, L.M., Dunbar, R.B., Ainley, D.G., Dodds, K-J., Gjerde, K.M., Sumaila, U.R.: Science-based management in decline in the Southern Ocean, Science, 354 (6309), 185-187, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4119
  6. Brooks, C.M., Crowder, L.B., Österblom, H., Strong, A.L.: Reaching consensus for conserving the global commons: the case of the Ross Sea, Antarctica, Conservation Letters, 13 (1), e12676, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12676
  7. Chown, S.L., Brooks, C.M., Terauds, A., Le Bohec, C., van Klaveren-Impagliazzo, C., Whittington, J.D., Butchart, S.H.M., Coetzee, B.W.T., Collen, B., Convey, P., ... McGeoch, M.A.: Antarctica and the strategic plan for biodiversity, PLoS Biology, 15 (3), e2001656, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001656
  8. Coetzee, B.W.T., Convey, P., Chown, S.L.: Expanding the protected area network in Antarctica is urgent and readily achievable, Conservation Letters, 10 (6), 670-680, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12342
  9. Cordonnery, L., Hemmings, A.D., Kriwoken, L.: Nexus and Imbroglio: CCAMLR, the Madrid Protocol and Designating Antarctic Marine Protected Areas in the Southern Ocean, International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 30 (4), 727-764, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-12341380
  10. Delegations of Argentina and Chile, Revised proposal for a conservation measure establishing a Marine Protected Area in Domain 1 (Western Antarctic Peninsula and South Scotia Arc), Meeting Document CCAMLR-38/25 Rev.1, Hobart, Australia, 2019.
  11. Fedchuk, A., Parnikoza, I., Kozeretska, I., Berezkina, A., Sinna, O., Utevsky, S., Levenets, V., Utevsky, A., Pshenichnov, L., Demianenko, K., Milinevsky, G., Dykyi, E.: Preliminary proposal for designation an Antarctic Specially Protected Area in the Argentine Islands Archipelago and nearby Graham Coast Antarctic Peninsula region, Meeting Document SC-CAMLR-38/BG/21 Rev. 1, Hobart, Australia, 2019.
  12. Hinke, J.T., Barbosa, A., Emmerson, L.M., Hart, T., Juáres, M.A., Korczak-Abshire, M., Milinevsky, G., Santos, M., Trathan, P.N., Watters, G.M., Southwell, C.: Estimating nest level phenology and reproductive success of colonial seabirds using time-lapse cameras, Methods in Ecolology and Evolution, 9 (8), 1853-1863, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13015
  13. Hinke, J.T., Santos, M.M., Korczak-Abshire, M., Milinevsky, G., Watters, G.M.: Individual variation in migratory movements of chinstrap penguins leads to widespread occupancy of ice-free winter habitats over the continental shelf and deep ocean basins of the Southern Ocean, PLoS ONE, 14 (12), e0226207, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226207
  14. Hughes, K.A., Grant, S.M.: The spatial distribution of Antarctica's protected areas: A product of pragmatism, geopolitics or conservation need? Environmental science & Policy, 72, 41-51, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.009
  15. Hughes, K.A., Ireland, L.C., Convey, P., Fleming, A.H.: Assessing the effectiveness of specially protected areas for conservation of Antarctica's botanical diversity, Conservation Biology, 30 (1), 113-120, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12592
  16. Hughes, K.A., Pertierra, L.R., Walton, D.W.H.: Area protection in Antarctica: How can conservation and scientific research goals be managed compatibly? Environmental science & Policy, 31, 120-132, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.03.012
  17. Lynch, H.J., Crosbie, K., Fagan, W.F., Naveen, R.: Spatial patterns of tour ship traffic in the Antarctic Peninsula region, Antarctic Science, 22 (2), 123-130, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102009990654
  18. Parnikoza, I., Berezkina, A., Moiseyenko, Y., Malanchuk, V., Kunakh, V.: Complex survey of the Argentine Islands and Galindez Island (Maritime Antarctic) as a research area for studying the dynamics of terrestrial vegetation, Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 1 (17), 73-101, 2018. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.1(17).2018.34
  19. Report of the Thirty-eighth meeting of the CCAMLR Scientific Committee, Paragraphs 6.11-6.12, Hobart, Australia, 21 to 25 October 2019, 2019.
  20. Roura, R., Steenhuisen, F., Bastmeijer, K.: The shore is the limit: marine spatial protection in Antarctica under Annex V of the Environmental Protocol to the Antarctic Treaty, The Polar Journal, 8 (2), 289-314, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2018.1541549
  21. Shaw, J.D., Terauds, A., Riddle, M.J., Possingham, H.P., Chown, S.L.: Antarctica's Protected Areas Are Inadequate, Unrepresentative, and at Risk, PLoS Biology, 12 (6), 1-5, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888
  22. Sylvester, Z.T., Brooks, C.M.: Protecting Antarctica through Co-production of actionable science: Lessons from the CCAMLR marine protected area process, Marine Policy, 111, 103720, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103720
  23. Teschke, K., Pehlke, H., Siegel, V., Bornemann, H., Knust, R., Brey, T.: An integrated data compilation for the development of a marine protected area in the Weddell Sea, Earth System Science Data Discussions, 1-31, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2019-86
  24. Utevsky, A.Yu.: The first site of the Marine Protected Area network in the Akademik Vernadsky Station region: Argentine Islands, Skua Creek, Meeting Document, Meeting of the Commission on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, CCAMLR, 2-13 Jul 2012: WG-EMM-12/25, 2012.
  25. Utevsky, A.Yu., Sennaya, E.I., Kolesnykova, M.Yu.: Realization of the Marine Protected Area network in the Akademik Vernadsky Station region, CCAMLR, 21 June 2014: WG-EMM-14/41, 2014.
  26. Utevsky, A.Yu., Tabikelova, K.S., Sennaya, E.I., Utevsky, S.Yu.: Changes of population structure in common benthic species of the proposed Stella Creek MPA in the vicinity of the Akademik Vernadsky Station, Galindez Island, Antarctica, Meeting Document, Meeting of the CCAMLR, 21 June 2015: EMM-15-41, 2015.
  27. Utevsky, A., Sinna, E., Smyrov, D., Shrestha, M., Gamulya, Y., Ukhno, G., Khodzhaeva, R., Utevsky, Yu., Levenets, V., Utevsky, S.: Next steps in development of Marine Protected Area in the Argentine Islands Archipelago water area, Meeting Document, Meeting of the Commission on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, CCAMLR, 24 June 2018: WG-EMM-18/32, 2018.
  28. Wauchope, H.S., Shaw, J.D., Terauds, A.: A snapshot of biodiversity protection in Antarctica, Nature Communications, 10 (1), 946, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08915-6
  29. Wenzel, L., Gilbert, N., Goldsworthy, L., Tesar, C., McConnell, M., Okter, M.: Polar opposites? Marine conservation tools and experiences in the changing Arctic and Antarctic, Aquatic Conservation: Marine Freshwater Ecosystems, 26 (S2), 61-84, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2649