Ukrainian Antarctic Journal

No 8 (2009): Ukrainian Antarctic Journal
Articles

Deep structure of the Antarctic plate's boundary zone along midocean ridges on the cross-sections and lateral slices

PDF (Українська)
  • R. Kh. Greku,
  • T. R. Greku
R. Kh. Greku
Institute of geological sciences of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, National Antarctic Scientific Center of Ukraine, Kyiv
T. R. Greku
Institute of geological sciences of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.8.2009.435
Published December 16, 2009
Keywords
  • density anomalies,
  • plumes,
  • subducted slabs,
  • lithosphere
How to Cite
Greku, R. K., & Greku, T. R. (2009). Deep structure of the Antarctic plate’s boundary zone along midocean ridges on the cross-sections and lateral slices. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, (8), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.8.2009.435

Abstract

3D vertical structure of the Antarctic Plate's boundary along longitudinal cross-sections and lateral slices at different depths is displayed through a distribution of density anomalies relative to Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM) using the harmonic coefficients of the EGM96 geoid model. Features of interaction between the Antarctic Plate and other plates are shown with our gravimetric tomography data over more than 40,000 km along the palte boundary. Two bodies (plumes) dominate in the mantle. Less dense masses ascend from depth of 2800 km and then split up at the depth of 200 km as three branches to the Australian Antarctic Discordance (AAD), the Ross Sea and the Nazca plate. Dense masses descend from a surface as subducted slabs and collect at depths of 60 km and 280 km. It was discovered in the AAD area and the Nazca Ridge that thinning hot masses penetrate into the colder crust and lithosphere.

PDF (Українська)

References

  1. Lobkovskij, L.I., Nikishin, A.M., & Xain, V.E. (2004). Sovremenny`e problemy` geotektoniki i geodinamiki [Current problems of geotectonics and geodynamics]. Nauchny`j mir, Moscow. (in Russian).
  2. Andersen, O. B., & Knudsen, P. (1998). Global marine gravity field from the ERS-1 and Geosat geodetic mission altimetry. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(C4), 8129–8137.
  3. Bassin, C., Laske, G., & Masters, G. (2000). The Current Limits of Resolution for Surface Wave Tomography in North America. Eos, Transactions of American Geophysical Union, 81, F897.
  4. Bird, P. (2003). An updated digital model of plate boundaries. An Electronic Journal of the Earth Sciences, 4(3), 14 March 2003, doi:10.1029/2001GC000252
  5. Bulychev, A. A., Gilod, L. A., Gladun, V. A., Zaltsman, R.V. et al., (2000). Results of three-dimension modeling of the lithosphere by the satellite altimetry data in area of the Bouvet triple junction (South Atlantic), Vestnik of Moscow University, series 4, Geology, 74, 2, 76–87. (in Russian).
  6. Dietrich, R., Dach, R., Engelhargt, G., Ihde, J., Kutterer, H.-J., Lindner, K., Mayer, M., Menge, F., Miller, Heinrich, Müller, Christina, Niemeier, W., Perlt, J., Pohl, M., Salbach, H., Schenke, Hans-Werner, Schoene, T., Seeber, G., Veit, A. & Voelksen, C. (2001). Results of repeated GPS campaigns in Antarctica derived from different solutions. Journal of Geodesy, 74, 756-766.
  7. Greku, R. Kh, & Greku, T.R. (2006). Mantle and crustal structure of Antarctic along 170°W and 44°E meridians with the gravimetric tomography technique. In: C. Siddoway & C. A. Ricci (Eds.), Terra Antarctica Reports, No. 12, Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers and Opportunities in Antarctic Geosciences 2004, pp. 145–154. Terra Antarctica Publication, Siena, Italy.
  8. Gurnis, M., Müller, R. D., & Moresi, L. (1998). Cretaceous vertical motion of Australia and the Australian-Antarctic Discordance. Science, 279, 1499–1504.
  9. Jonson, G.L., Hey, R.N., & Lowrie, A. (1973). Marine Geology in the environs of Bouvet Island and the South-Atlantic triple junction. Marine Geophysical Researches, B2, 23–36.
  10. Lonsdale, P. (1994). Geomorphology and structural segmentation of the crest of the southern (Pacific-Antarctic) East Pacific Rise. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99(B3), 4683–4702.
  11. Moritz, H. (1990). The Figure of the Earth. Theoretical Geodesy and the Earth's Interior. Wichmann, Karlsruhe.
  12. Reading, A. M. (2006). On seismic strain-release within the Antarctic Plate. In D. K. Fütterer, D. Damaske, G. Kleinschmidt, H. Miller, & F. Tessensohn, Antarctica - Contributions to Global Earth Sciences, Proceedings of the IX International Symposium of Antarctic Earth Sciences Potsdam, 2003, pp. 351–355. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.
  13. Ritzwoller, M. H., Shapiro, N. M., Levshin, A. L., & Leahy, G.M. (2001). Crustal and upper mantle structure beneath Antarctica and surrounding oceans. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 12, 30645–30670.
  14. Storey, B.C. (1995). The role of mantle plumes in continental breakup: case histories from Gondwanaland. Nature, 377(28), 301–308.
  15. West, B.P., Wilcock, W.S.D., Sempere, J.-C., & Geli, L. (1997). The three-dimensional structure of asthenospheric flow beneath the Southeast Indian Ridge. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 7783-7802.
  16. Murphy, J.B., Oppliger, G.L., & Brimhall, G.H. (1998). Plume-modified orogeny: and example from the western United States. Geology, 26, 731–734.