Ukrainian Antarctic Journal

No 10-11 (2012): Ukrainian Antarctic Journal
Articles

The evolution of the Antarctic Treaty System: a structure and dynamics of the acts adopted for 1961-2011

A. Fedchuk
National Antarctic Scientific Center, Kyiv
Published March 15, 2012
Keywords
  • Antarctic Treaty System,
  • adopted acts,
  • legal regime developments
How to Cite
Fedchuk, A. (2012). The evolution of the Antarctic Treaty System: a structure and dynamics of the acts adopted for 1961-2011. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, (10-11), 406-427. https://doi.org/10.33275/1727-7485.10-11.2012.330

Abstract

This article gives an overview of the international-political preconditions and specific development of the governmental regime based on the Antarctic Treaty of 1959 and knowing as the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS). The structure and dynamics of all political acts are analyzed (such as conventions, protocol, agreed measures, decisions, resolutions and recommendations as well), which were adopted during all regular and special meetings within the ATS for 1961-2011. The topical issues for each decade were indicated: the 1960s – ensuring information exchange and entering into inter-national scientific cooperation; the 1970s – the prospect of exploration and exploitation of natural researches in the Antarctic region. The 1980s was the most complex and dynamic period in the history of the Antarctic governance. Four parallel developments were characterized of the ATS for that period as the following: the intensifying debate among the Consultative Parties within the ATS; the attack on the ATS by a group of developing countries which were outside the ATS; the increasing support for the ATS from countries outside the ATS and achieving a member status; and the growing concern about the conservation of Antarctica, initiated by the environmental movement. This last development became the dominant in the future 1990s. The acts in the 2000s were adopted in order to strengthen and to institualizate the ATS as well as to anticipate its new challenges such as invasion of non-native species, organization human activities with a glance of natural changes in Antarctic ecosystems due to global and regional climate warming; and regulating commercial activities.  First of all, the attention should be paid on Antarctic tourism and bioprospecting. In spite of developmental character of the ATS two short and critical periods of bifurcation were indicated with 30-years interval. The first one (1959-1961) ended when Antarctic Treaty entered into force. It was a real success of international diplomacy as international conflicts were turned into stability and effective co-operation. The second one ended with adoption of the Protocol on environmental protection. Consequently Antarctica as a potential region of mining was turned into natural reserve devoted to piece and science. The estimated third bifurcation point will be in 2041, because of Environmental Protocol expiry as well as actualization the sovereignty claims and delimitation of continental shelf in the South ocean.

References

  1. Shipczov, A., Ancelevich, G., Efremov, V. et al. (1997). Antarktika: istoriya, sovremennost`, perspektivy` [Antarctica: history, modernity, perspectives]. Nacz. agentstvo morsk. issled. i texnol. Kyiv, Naukova dumka.
  2. Golicyn, V. (1989). Antarktika: tendencii razvitiya rezhima [Antarctica: tendencies of regime development]. Moscow, Mezhdunar. otnosheniya.
  3. Slevitch, S. (1985). Antarktika v sovremennom mire [Antarctica in the modern world]. Moscow, My`sl`. pp. 164–177.
  4. Fedchuk, A. (2006). Istorychni mistsia i pamiatky Antarktyky: klasyfikatsiino-prostorovyi analiz dlia potreb turyzmu [Historical places and monuments of Antarctica: classification-spatial analysis for the requirements of tourism]. Istoriia ukrainskoi heohrafii. Vseukrainskyi naukovo-teoretychnyi chasopys. Ternopil, Pidruchnyky i posibnyky, 1 (13). pp. 100–106.
  5. Fedchuk, A. (2010). Rozvytok turyzmu na antarktychnykh stantsiiakh: analiz pozytsii Konsultatyvnykh Storin ta perspektyvy dlia Ukrainy [Development of tourism at Antarctic Stations: the analysis of Consultative Parties’ positions and prospects for Ukraine]. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 9, 302–320.
  6. Fedchuk, A. (2009). Struktura shyrokomasshtabnoho upravlinnia u raioni stantsii Akademyk Vernadskyi [Structure of the large-scale management in the region of the Akademik Vernadsky Station]. Ukrainian Antarctic Journal, 8, 307–319.
  7. Abbink, B. (2007). Antarctica in the 1980s: subject of international politics. In: C. Lüdecke (Ed.), Steps of Foundation of Institutionalized Antarctic Research. Munich. pp. 163–177.
  8. Bos, A. (1991). Consultative Status under the Antarctic Treaty: redefining the criteria? In: A. Jørgensen-Dahl & W. Østreng (Eds.), The Antarctic Treaty System in world politics. Fridtjof Nansen Institute. pp. 335–342.
  9. Chaturvedi, S. (1996). The polar regions. A political geography. Chichester, etc.: Scott Polar Research Institute.
  10. Coll, A.R., & Anthony, C.A. (Eds.). (1985). The Falklands war: lessons for strategy diplomacy and international law. Boston etc., Allen & Unwin.
  11. Davis, J. (2007). The National Geographic Magazine’s portrayals of Antarctica. In: C. Lüdecke (Ed.), Steps of Foundation of Institutionalized Antarctic Research. Proceedings of the 1st SCAR Workshop on the History of Antarctic Research (Munich, 2-3 June, 2005). –Munich, 2007. – pp. 28–50.
  12. Dodds, K. (1997). Geopolitics in Antarctica: views from the Southern Oceanic Rim. Chichester etc., Scott Polar Research Institute.
  13. Herr, R., & Davis, B. (1996). ATS decision-making and change: the role of domestic politics in Australia. In O. Schram Stokke, D. Vidas (Eds.), Governing the Antarctic: The effectiveness and legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System. Cambridge University Press. pp. 331–360.
  14. Meadows, D. (1972). The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. London, Earth Island Limited.
  15. Mosley, G. (2007). Antarctica: Securing its heritage for the whole world. Chanterbury.
  16. Russian Federation. (2009). On the strategic role of the Antarctic Treaty of 1959 in the process of regulation of international relations in the South Polar region of the Earth. Working Paper WP-46, XXXІI Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (April 6-17, 2009, Baltimore, USA, 2009).
  17. Russian Federation. (2008). Оn the status and development of the Antarctic Treaty System. Working Paper WP-49, XXXІ Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (June 2-13, 2008, Kyiv). Kyiv, 2008.
  18. Suter, K. (1991). Antarctica: private property or public heritage? Leichhardt, Pluto Press Australia, & London, Zed Books Ltd.
  19. Trolle-Andersen, R. (1987). The Antarctic scene: legal and political facts. In G. D. Triggs (Ed.), The Antarctic Treaty regime: law, environment and resources. Cambridge University Press. pp. 57-64.